Replacing Quesnel’s Junior Secondary School

On Tuesday Bob had the opportunity to ask the Minister of Education questions about replacing Quesnel’s junior secondary school. The Minister acknowledged that the school needs to be replaced, and he indicated that a new school would be a high priority when possible. You can watch a video clip of Bob’s questions here. The following is a transcript of his questions to the Minister.

B. Simpson: I have two areas I’d like to canvass. One, I’m sure the minister won’t be surprised, is the Pacific Carbon Trust, a little bit. I did watch the exchange, and I have some questions that I’d like to wrap around that exchange just for clarity. But the first one I want to start with — and it does go to policy that the government has around new capital projects — is in the Quesnel school district. Continue reading

B.C.’s Independent MLAs call for release of health and safety report

Victoria, B.C. – B.C.’s Independent MLAs are calling on the government to immediately release its health and safety public engagement report responding to oil and gas development in Northeastern B.C.

Bob Simpson (Cariboo North) and Vicki Huntington (Delta South) hope to hear what health and safety concerns the government has identified in northeastern B.C. – the centre of natural gas development in the province.

“The Minister of Health received the public engagement report on March 31. It’s been over a month now, and we would like to see what health and safety concerns were identified,” says Huntington. “While the government has the document, it shouldn’t be withheld from people directly impacted by natural gas fracking. They deserve to hear about the health and safety concerns affecting their families and communities.”

In January, the Fraser Basin Council was commissioned to undertake the public engagement – the first phase of the Ministry of Health’s three-phase human health risk assessment of oil and gas development in the North. Hydraulic fracturing (or “fracking”) technology has tapped vast underground shale gas reserves and is a controversial process linked to man-made earthquakes, significant water usage, and incidents of environmental contamination and poisonous sour gas leaks.

In Question Period Tuesday, Huntington called on the government to release the report, noting groups including the Northern Health Authority, the Peace River Regional District, various First Nations, the BC Grain Producers Association, and the Peace Environment and Safety Trustees Society have all “demanded action.” In February 2011, citizens, labour, health groups, and other organizations called for a public inquiry into whether the current regulation of oil and gas adequately protects public health.

The Independent MLAs visited the Peace River region in March to explore some of these issues firsthand and listen to local concerns. “The Premier promised this project to people over a year ago,” said Bob Simpson, MLA for Cariboo North. “The report represents the first stage of the process, and it’s been sitting on the Minister’s desk for over a month. People in the Peace want to know when it will be released and when the next phase will begin.” Both Independent MLAs believe phase two of the study needs to begin immediately.

Preventing Future Tragedies

Another worker lost his life in a sawmill yesterday. There will be yet another investigation, more recriminations and second guessing, but nothing will change the fact that another human being went to work and won’t ever come home.

I spent some time with the workers from the Lakeland Mill last night and stood with them as they silently reflected on this most recent tragedy at another BC sawmill. I had some explaining to do regarding comments ascribed to me in the media about the future of the Lakeland Mill that had made some of the workers angry.

During the evening I was able to speak with workers who were in the mill the night it exploded, men who rescued their co-workers, stripped off their burned clothes, and gave what first aid and comfort they could while they waited for the ambulances to arrive.

It was a sober reminder that while we argue about what could and should have been done, who’s to blame, and what needs to be done now, there are people who will be both physically and emotionally scarred because the system of essentially self-regulated workplaces failed them.

For too long we’ve bought into the mantra that we can penny pinch on enforcement and replace standards and regulations with voluntary compliance and industry-led safety councils and still have the highest health and safety standards in our workplaces. We can’t and we don’t, as recent events have so tragically proved.

If we’re truly going to honour those who have lost their lives in this most recent and catastrophic round of workplace incidents, then we have to reassert the need for government regulations and standards and for stringent enforcement of those standards through unannounced inspections and more inspectors. Workers’ voices must be listened to in the design of safety systems and during the inspection and compliance process.

In short, government regulations and enforcement are the best tools we have to protect the public interest and improve the safety of workers. It’s time to halt deregulation and the pretense that industry can both maximize profits and protect workers (and the environment). To be clear, this is not an indictment of industry, or of the specific companies involved in these most recent incidents. It is an indictment of the ideology of self-regulation and minimalist government. In a profit-driven economy, government must play an active role in protecting the public interest through best practice regulations in order to prevent a race to the bottom that puts workers and the environment at risk.

Bad Data, Bad Decisions

There’s an adage in business that you can’t manage what you don’t measure. Put another way, if you don’t have good data about something, then you won’t be able to successfully manage that particular aspect of your business.

The single largest public asset in British Columbia is our forests; the estimated economic value of those forests is approximately one quarter of a trillion dollars. Despite the importance of our forests, it’s become increasingly clear that the provincial government’s data about our public forests is no longer accurate or trusted.

For some time now, the Association of BC Forest Professionals has been calling on the government to increase investment in forest inventory while pointing out weaknesses in the current inventory system.

A November 2011 report from the Forest Practices Board concluded that they “do not have confidence that the forest ministry can adequately describe the current condition of the managed forest or track changes in its condition into the future.”

This lack of confidence was echoed in a community consultation process conducted by the BC Government Employee’s Union, which concluded that “a central issue for … participants was the lack of up-to-date forest inventory information.” Those same participants believed government was “irresponsibly risking one of our most valuable resources,” because good forest management decisions could not be made without accurate, up-to-date information about the state of our forests.

An Auditor General’s report released in February brought all of these concerns together in one scathing indictment of the government’s lack of knowledge about, and vision for, BC’s public forests. Unfortunately, the Minister responsible chose to dismiss the Auditor General’s assessment.

In contrast, the Bulkley-Nechako Regional District reacted to the Auditor General’s report by unanimously passing a resolution to hire their own forest professionals to give them independent and more accurate assessments of the timber supply and state of the forests along Highway 16 than they believe they’re getting from government.

I brought all of these concerns to the Minister responsible during budget estimates debates this past week. The Minister said he was confident he had the information he needed to manage our public forests. Unfortunately, it seems few others share his confidence.

Before we can have meaningful conversations about options to increase timber supply in our region, we’re going to need more accurate and trustworthy information about the state of our forests than the government currently has to offer. Yes, budgets are tight in today’s economy, but re- inventorying our public forests will be money well spent, because this data is essential to making better management decisions about our largest public asset.

Bill 36 – Distance Learning and School Calendars

Yesterday in the House Bob spoke about Bill 36, which introduces amendments to the School Act. In particular, it would give school districts greater flexibility to create alternate school calendars, and it also initiates a process to allow K-to-9 students the option of taking part in both distance and classroom learning simultaneously. Video of Bob’s remarks is available here, and the following is a transcript of Bob’s comments.

B. Simpson: Again, I want to start off by thanking the minister and the minister’s staff for a briefing that I was given on this bill. I had some questions to even speak to the bill before we get into the committee stage. It’s always great to have access to staff to have some of those questions dealt with in advance of us bringing it into the House. Continue reading

Bob in the House – FLNRO Estimates

Video of Bob’s questions is available here and here.

B. Simpson: I just want to canvass a little bit around timing on this. The options that the minister is referring to are what have been dubbed in the public domain as logging in the reserves or looking at areas that are constrained under other land use values. That’s certainly one of the options.

The minister is aware that the UBCM 2010 was the resolution that is being pegged as the timing and as the incident that caused the government to begin to look at this. In the June 2011 report from the chief forester to the Association of B.C. Forest Professionals in their “Viewpoints” in their magazine, it says that the analysis for that is underway and expected to be complete during the summer of 2011 — so last summer. When is it that the minister actually got the technical analysis reports for the four timber supply areas in question? Continue reading

Taseko rejects aboriginal spirituality in mine review

Jackie Sharkey, CBC News
May 1st, 2012

The president of Taseko Mines has asked the Ministry of the Environment not to give aboriginal interests special consideration at an upcoming federal environmental review panel for the company’s Prosperity Mine project.

In a letter dated Nov. 23, Russell Hallbauer makes several suggestions on how to ensure the panel appears fair and balanced as it considers Taseko’s gold and copper mine proposal near Williams Lake, B.C. Continue reading

Poisoned Relationships

This weekend I was provided with a letter that Taseko Mines President Russ Hallbauer sent to Federal Environment Minister Peter Kent last November. The letter was sent in advance of the new panel hearings into Taseko’s proposed Prosperity Project. Unfortunately, the letter clearly illustrates why the Tsilhqot’in (TNG) will fight, with every means available to them, Taseko’s right to the “Prosperity” ore body on their traditional territory. It also illustrates why some First Nations’ leaders are saying Prosperity is not only the wrong project, but the wrong company.

The letter asks Minister Kent, under threat of legal action by Taseko, to ensure that no First Nations person is put on the new review panel, to disallow any ceremonial activities during the panel hearings (drumming and prayers), to not allow children to demonstrate their concerns through plays, and to reject spirituality as a consideration in the mine proposal. The letter argues that emotional displays like drumming and children’s plays will, consciously or unconsciously, sway the panel in favour of the First Nations and against the “science” of Taseko’s case. Continue reading

Taseko asked Minister Kent to restrict First Nations’ role in mine review

Andrew MacLeod, The Tyee
May 1st, 2012

The president and CEO of Taseko Mines Ltd. wrote to Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent asking the federal government to limit First Nations participation in the review of Prosperity Mine, a project opposed by the Tsilhqot’in National Government.

On Nov. 7, 2011, the federal government announced a review panel would be appointed for an environmental assessment of Taseko’s revised proposal for the mine. A previous federal panel advised against the earlier version of the project, which would have had “significant adverse environmental effects.” Continue reading

Taseko Mines asks Harper to place limits on first nations input

Justine Hunter, Globe and Mail
April 30, 2012

No aboriginal prayer ceremonies, please, and no kindergarten plays about dead fish: The request from Taseko Mines Ltd. seeks to reshape the federal environmental review for its new Prosperity Mines application.

The review is expected to get under way as early as this week, with the appointment of a panel and terms of reference, after the company’s first proposal for a copper and gold mine was rejected because of significant adverse environmental effects. Continue reading